Sharing key investor debates and pushback following initiation of coverage
We initiated coverage of GEK TERNA last week with a Buy rating and €55/sh price target [link]. We see the company as a core infrastructure holding, offering long-duration, concession-led earnings growth and a market-leading construction franchise at an undemanding valuation relative to peers. Feedback from 10+ investor meetings over the past week has been constructive. Investors generally agreed that the earnings potential of Attiki Odos and Egnatia Odos remains underappreciated, while debate centred on the sustainability of construction leadership, execution and political risks, as well as the potential for further upside following strong share-price performance YTD. We host the CFO and IR team at our annual conference 9-10 September [sign up here] and, in this note, we address pushback as well as outline the catalysts ahead.
Investors positive on Attiki/Egnatia asset potential ; questions on Construction leadership /catalysts
Agreement: Under-appreciation of i) Attiki Odos price inelasticity of demand, with debate centred around the speed and extent to which the company could look to implement dynamic pricing; ii) traffic/digitisation opportunity of Egnatia Odos, with opex tailwinds from a catch-up in e-ticket penetration and traffic growth potential following significant capex revamp offering growth prospects beyond the tariff rebase.
Pushback: i) scope for further re-rating. Despite strong share-price performance YTD, we note GEK TERNA continues to trade at a significant discount to infrastructure peers based on its growth profile, whilst our implied valuations for Attiki Odos and Egnatia Odos assets screen as undemanding vs other toll road assets given duration and pricing power characteristics (Figure 1-3); ii) growing competition, with some investors concerned about the risk of a major international contractor acquiring a domestic player. Whilst it cannot be ruled out, the possibility has existed for several years, yet international groups continue to partner with established local contractors, highlighting the importance of local expertise and stakeholder relationships (Figure 4); iii) Construction risk – whilst we acknowledge the complexity/scale of upcoming projects, we take comfort in recent declines in W/C intensity, reducing balance sheet risk associated with execution (Figure 5); and iv) political risk, where elections could delay individual tenders but, the risk of a coalition government, in our view, is unlikely to alter the direction of Greece’s infrastructure investment pipeline.
Valuation: Buy, PT €55/sh
We value GEK TERNA using a SoTP combining asset-level concession DCFs and a multiple-based approach for Contracting. Key catalysts: upcoming concession/PPP awards in the next 6-12m and 1H results (September), which could allow investors to further de-risk strategy execution on Attiki/Egnatia Odos.
Addressing investor pushback
i) Scope for further re-rating: Some investors questioned the potential for further upside following the shares’ strong year-to-date performance. However, GEK TERNA continues to trade at a significant discount to international infrastructure peers despite its stronger growth profile. Our €55/share price target implies approximately 25x FY28E P/E, compared with around 20x at the current share price. While we acknowledge the more diversified nature of international peers could justify GEK TERNA trading at a discount, we view current levels as excessive (Figure 2). An asset-level comparison also suggests that our implied valuations for Attiki Odos and Egnatia Odos are undemanding relative to assets of listed infrastructure peers such as Ferrovial, given pricing power and duration characteristics (Figure 1).
ii) Growing competition: Some investors argued that GEK TERNA’s market leadership and Greece’s oligopolistic market structure could come under pressure if a major international contractor acquired a domestic player to establish a larger local presence. While we cannot rule this out, the risk has existed for several years and international groups have continued to participate in major Greek motorway concessions alongside established domestic contractors (Figure 4). In our view, this reflects the importance of deep local market expertise, established stakeholder relationships and a proven execution track record.
iii) Execution risk: Investors also highlighted the execution risk associated with delivering projects in the construction backlog. While inherent in large infrastructure projects, we take comfort from a reduction in w/c intensity over the last few years , which in our view reduces balance sheet risk associated with project execution (Figure 5)
iv) Political risk: Investors raised concerns around the next Greek election. Based on latest polling, we note the New Democracy party has ~30% vote share (Figure 6). Whilst we acknowledge that the New Democracy may not secure enough seats to form a single-party majority (~37-40% given bonus seating allocation), we believe a coalition government does not pose risk to infrastructure-policy continuity. Greece’s infrastructure pipeline is supported by long-term investment needs and multiple sources of public and private funding. Whilst the election could affect the timing of individual tenders, in our view, it is unlikely to alter the overall direction of infrastructure investment and remains a question of when, rather than if projects will be executed.
We believe a mid-teens EV/2028E EBITDA valuation for Attiki Odos and Egnatia Odos is undemanding in the context of asset pricing power/duration characteristics – this compares to some of Ferrovial’s North American toll roads we value on ~20-30x EV/2028E EBITDA with similar duration and slightly stronger pricing power. We see scope for multiples to further expand towards high teens as operational performance ramps and execution risk diminishes.